So should she be made to pay money back ?

[pauljh74]

Originally Posted by Adamz Ghia

Pretty good world we live in where a parent can forced to pay unpaid child support, yet isn’t entitled to money back if the child isn’t theirs.

In cases of child support, how is a DNA test not standard practice? It’s not an invasive thing on the child at all.

Feminists have campaigned against paternity fraud law reform with the simple phrase "best interests of the child". The governments sweep it under the rug because ultimately they don't want to have to support the child either. As long as some mug is on the hook, they don't care as evidenced by hounding the man when he owes child support and abandoning him completely when he is owed the money as a result of a DNA test showing he isn't the father. He's faced with expensive legal fees to attempt to recoup the money and there's still no guarantee it will be repaid.

Most men if their partner tells them "I'm pregnant" - unless she follows it up with information about another man, the assumption is it is his and he doesn't question it, unless there's good reason to suspect infidelity. If a woman has had sex with more than 1 man around the time of conception, she knows it isn't 100% his without a test. She owes it to the child at least to know for sure.

Why do they do it? The guy with the good job is a better mark than the guy she hooked up with on Tinder and women don't want that "choice" taken away from them.