Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > Club and Speciality Forums > Forum Community Car Clubs > AU Falcon.com.au

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 30-10-2005, 11:52 AM   #31
jonbays
TL40 Wagon?
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,377
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by krustytheclown
When i first started modifying my AU series1 VCT Ghia first thing as follows......
Results are from the MDX dyno at cresent motorsports
Cat back exhaust and air filter-peaked 126kw and averaged 116kw......

Then went back with PIG PIPE and SS INDUCTION fitted and averaged 126kw and peaked at 133kw......
Oh then i did a run at REDCLIFFE DYNO back in august this year and got 133rwkw before PIG PIPE was fitted..................

Now car has been fitted with a brand new Exhaust system and Advance headers and with the other goodies the car has around the 140rwkw and it feels like it too when you open it up.

Thats my view on things.......
Peak and average power is all dyno BS dynos lie The stock intake isn't really a worry on a 140rwkw car.
jonbays is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-10-2005, 06:35 PM   #32
Sleeperau
Highway Taxi
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 592
Default

The pig pipe seems to have made a considerable difference in my car. Has anyone else had dyno tests. Interestingly the results from the workshop section state a considerable difference in pigs car
__________________
Close only counts in Horse Shoes & Hand Grenades. :evil_laug
Sleeperau is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 31-10-2005, 02:35 PM   #33
DailyDriver
Regular Member
 
DailyDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 78
Default

If I'm going to put a Lukey exhaust on my 2001 AU2 Falcon sedan , how much will my power etc jump up by?
__________________
A Foot In Both Camps......

All Go.......VXSS.....380bhp

All Show...2001 AU2 SR...210bhp...SOLD!
DailyDriver is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 31-10-2005, 04:27 PM   #34
Sleeperau
Highway Taxi
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 592
Default

with or without headers?
__________________
Close only counts in Horse Shoes & Hand Grenades. :evil_laug
Sleeperau is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 31-10-2005, 05:18 PM   #35
JC
Miami Pilot
Donating Member2
 
JC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ACT
Posts: 21,701
Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: Writing tech articles 
Default

Between 0 and 5rwkw with cats back, and maybe as much as 10rwkw with headers. But your torque curve shopuld improve as well, as should throttle response. It's not all about increasing power - some mods just bring the power lower in the rev range, while others flatten out the torque curve.
__________________
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hammer: FG GTE | 376rwkw | 1/4 mile 11.793 @ 119.75mph 1.733 60' (4408lb)
1 of 60 FG MK1 335 GTEs (1 of 118 FG Mk 1 & 2 335 GTEs).
Mods: Tune, HSD/ShockWorks, black GT335 19” staggered replicas with 245 & 275/35/19 Michelin Pilot sport 5s

Daily: BF2 Fairmont Ghia I6 ZF, machine face GT335 19” staggered Replicas with 245s and 275s, Bilsteins & Kings

FPV 335 build stats: <click here>

Ford Performance Club ACT
JC is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 31-10-2005, 06:07 PM   #36
DailyDriver
Regular Member
 
DailyDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 78
Default

Initialy without changing the headers, I’ll do that later. Your right, the extra power is not what I’m after, I would like a nice sounding note coming through the exhaust and the feeling of a bit more power from low in the rev range.

Will these be noticeable changes??
__________________
A Foot In Both Camps......

All Go.......VXSS.....380bhp

All Show...2001 AU2 SR...210bhp...SOLD!
DailyDriver is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 31-10-2005, 06:15 PM   #37
TheSneakiness
Adapt or perish...
 
TheSneakiness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dip!@#$
Posts: 7,954
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jonbays
Model FWKW RWKW 0-100k 400m
AU Auto 157 105 8.8 16.3
I find this interesting.

My ute is basically this, and when I had it dyno'ed last (CAI being the only mod, 50mm restrictor ring in the TB for gas), it pulled 141.8 RWHP, which is 105.7 RWKW.

I'm hoping it's more now because of the headers and new cat back, but like I've read a million times here, dyno figures mean squat, it's about the track time.
__________________
Carless
TheSneakiness is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 31-10-2005, 06:27 PM   #38
DailyDriver
Regular Member
 
DailyDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 78
Default

Quote:
Model FWKW RWKW 0-100k 400m
AU Auto 157 105 8.8 16.3
These stock figures look kinda low for a 4.0 litre. When I tried my AU2 (unmodified) car it didn't feel that slow, it felt like it could do the 0 - 100km/h in about 7-7.5 seconds.
__________________
A Foot In Both Camps......

All Go.......VXSS.....380bhp

All Show...2001 AU2 SR...210bhp...SOLD!
DailyDriver is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 31-10-2005, 06:48 PM   #39
LG
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
LG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 2,434
Default

My car is an AUIII basically stock and it ran a 16.3. I have a cat-back exhaust and some intake mods and pulled 113rwkw. But that extra power, is cancelled out by the added weight of my 18s and other stuff. So it's a fairly accurate indication.
__________________
AUIII Falcon Forte, with SIX Appeal
LG is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 31-10-2005, 07:02 PM   #40
EL8TED
It all counts
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 712
Default

Forgive me for invading AU LAND with my EL SHIP .. how much would the 185 AU1 times and power figures differ from my EL 2 XR8 ?? Anybody know of a comparison ?
__________________
NWOLB 8 built by Autotech Engineering tuned by KPM
EL8TED is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 31-10-2005, 08:56 PM   #41
jonbays
TL40 Wagon?
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,377
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DailyDriver
These stock figures look kinda low for a 4.0 litre. When I tried my AU2 (unmodified) car it didn't feel that slow, it felt like it could do the 0 - 100km/h in about 7-7.5 seconds.
These numbers are just a guide but I am pretty spot on and not into BS so its what you wouldn't be unhappy to get out of a stock AU.

Run it at the strip or borrow a gtech and see how you go.
jonbays is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 31-10-2005, 09:32 PM   #42
JC
Miami Pilot
Donating Member2
 
JC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ACT
Posts: 21,701
Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: Writing tech articles 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DailyDriver
These stock figures look kinda low for a 4.0 litre. When I tried my AU2 (unmodified) car it didn't feel that slow, it felt like it could do the 0 - 100km/h in about 7-7.5 seconds.
Which figures look low? The power? Well 157 is what Ford claimed (from EF on, I think) and 105 is about right for rwkw.

The times would also be about right. If your unmodified car "feels" like a 7 second car, then your internal clock must be fast. LOL.

Anywhere around 9 seconds for an auto AU is about right to 100km/h. According to G-Tech, the best I have done in my wagon is 8.5, which is pretty good considering stock is 9+, but nowhere near jonbays or useless' modded wagons (7 to 8 seconds).
__________________
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hammer: FG GTE | 376rwkw | 1/4 mile 11.793 @ 119.75mph 1.733 60' (4408lb)
1 of 60 FG MK1 335 GTEs (1 of 118 FG Mk 1 & 2 335 GTEs).
Mods: Tune, HSD/ShockWorks, black GT335 19” staggered replicas with 245 & 275/35/19 Michelin Pilot sport 5s

Daily: BF2 Fairmont Ghia I6 ZF, machine face GT335 19” staggered Replicas with 245s and 275s, Bilsteins & Kings

FPV 335 build stats: <click here>

Ford Performance Club ACT
JC is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 31-10-2005, 09:39 PM   #43
xr8ute
Back on the road
 
xr8ute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wollongong, NSW
Posts: 3,205
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DailyDriver
it felt like it could do the 0 - 100km/h in about 7-7.5 seconds
believe it or not, ****-dynos are actually even more subjective and open to misinterpretation than chassis dynos
__________________
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

AU XR8 Ute 13.90 @ 100mph - http://www.aufalcon.com/xr8ute
5L Windsor, GT40X heads, Crane 2030, Pacey 4-1s, Lukey 3", 3.91:1, auto. Tuned by me w/Quarterhorse and BinaryEditor.

Coming Soon: Ported lower intake, Tickford "Premium" Brakes, and a good wash.
xr8ute is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 31-10-2005, 09:39 PM   #44
JC
Miami Pilot
Donating Member2
 
JC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ACT
Posts: 21,701
Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: Writing tech articles 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EL8TED
Forgive me for invading AU LAND with my EL SHIP .. how much would the 185 AU1 times and power figures differ from my EL 2 XR8 ?? Anybody know of a comparison ?
EL2 XR8 manual 0-100 is 7.6 seconds.
AU1 XR8 Manual is around 7.2 seconds
AU1 XR8 auto is 7.8 seconds (mine does 7.2, but it has exhaust and intake mods)
__________________
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hammer: FG GTE | 376rwkw | 1/4 mile 11.793 @ 119.75mph 1.733 60' (4408lb)
1 of 60 FG MK1 335 GTEs (1 of 118 FG Mk 1 & 2 335 GTEs).
Mods: Tune, HSD/ShockWorks, black GT335 19” staggered replicas with 245 & 275/35/19 Michelin Pilot sport 5s

Daily: BF2 Fairmont Ghia I6 ZF, machine face GT335 19” staggered Replicas with 245s and 275s, Bilsteins & Kings

FPV 335 build stats: <click here>

Ford Performance Club ACT

Last edited by JC; 31-10-2005 at 09:50 PM.
JC is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 31-10-2005, 09:43 PM   #45
5 FTR 5
Made the 300 :0)
 
5 FTR 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dayton W.A
Posts: 544
Default

Before the mods i did on the dyno it got 163rwkw after 184rwkw is was over a few months,i havent got a chip yet but the AU edit is going in soon.Ive not taken it down the strip but used my mates G-tech and after three runs the best was 13.9 at 102mph I dont no how good these are but Im happy.Sorry its a manual.
__________________
New Owner of a fiesta ST
5 FTR 5 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-11-2005, 02:13 PM   #46
DailyDriver
Regular Member
 
DailyDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 78
Default

Quote:
Which figures look low? The power? Well 157 is what Ford claimed (from EF on, I think) and 105 is about right for rwkw.
I meant the figure of 8.8 seconds. It just sounds slow, but I guess when you're behind the wheel it feels fast enough (I am used to driving V8's..). When I get my exhaust and headers done, I should feel the power of the I6 a bit more (& louder to I hope).
__________________
A Foot In Both Camps......

All Go.......VXSS.....380bhp

All Show...2001 AU2 SR...210bhp...SOLD!
DailyDriver is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 02-11-2005, 08:41 PM   #47
Tornado
AKA MYTE8
 
Tornado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,325
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jonbays
Yes I agree with you on that one but funnily enough I have a test on a TE50 Auto that only ran 0-100 in 7.23 and the 400m in 15.19.

Anway yes its a mistake I would agree 14.7-14.9 would be more likely.
I beleive the average stock 250kw T3 T-Series would put out the following..
T3 T-Series Auto 195rwkw
T3 T-Series Manual 205rwkw

T3 TE50 Auto 400m ~14.2
T3 TE50 Man 400m ~14.1

T3 TS50 Auto 400m ~14.3
T3 TS50 Man 400m ~14.2

And as Shane has said these figures change alot with a simple exhaust mod.
Tornado is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 01:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL