Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19-05-2011, 07:41 PM   #31
Benjamin Smith
Regular Member
 
Benjamin Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Toowoomba, QLD
Posts: 227
Default Re: $40m taxpayer injection for lightweight Commodore

Holden wouldn't be here today if it wasn't for all the money the government was putting in to it
Benjamin Smith is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-05-2011, 07:46 PM   #32
vztrt
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
 
vztrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,797
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: vztrt is one of the most consistent and respected contributors to AFF, I have found his contributions are most useful to discussion as well as answering members queries. 
Default Re: $40m taxpayer injection for lightweight Commodore

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benjamin Smith
Holden wouldn't be here today if it wasn't for all the money the government was putting in to it

Neither would the Falcon and Terri.
__________________
Daniel
vztrt is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-05-2011, 08:21 PM   #33
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default Re: $40m taxpayer injection for lightweight Commodore

Quote:
Originally Posted by stang65
I know Ford was involved in a new high tensile steel that was meant to be thinner than the current steel but stronger.
Ford have been using lightweight bake hardened steel since the AU. Thinner but stronger than the previous steel they used.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobthebilda
Rolled steel has a weight of approx 7800 kg a cubic metre. Aluminium has a weight of 2600kg a cubic metre. ie Aluminium is roughly 1/3 the weight of rolled steel. To get a weight saving of 7% on a 1700kg Commodore, you need to knock off 119 kilograms. 119/2 x 3 = Thus the current weight of the steel panels they are looking to replace are 178 kilos, to be replaced with 59 kilo aluminium panels.

At a rough guess, they are taking out $170 of steel, and putting in $427 of aluminium. So adding about $260 of metal to the car. But I am pretty sure they will also need to change alot of the tooling too.

Its hard not to be a cynic with these announcements, so I am pretty sure we will find out (in 2013) that the panels they were referring to were the Holden badges on the front and rear of the car.
Aluminium bonnets require a lot more bracing to keep them from flopping around compared to steel, so that cuts the weight advantage a bit. Ford trialled aluminium bonnets on the BA, there was a black Fairmont Ghia with a buldge bonnet that PD were testing, but they found that the bonnet flopped around a lot and needed a lot more bracing to keep it rigid. It didn't progress any further than testing.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-05-2011, 08:56 PM   #34
bobthebilda
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,242
Default Re: $40m taxpayer injection for lightweight Commodore

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bossxr8
Ford have been using lightweight bake hardened steel since the AU. Thinner but stronger than the previous steel they used.


Aluminium bonnets require a lot more bracing to keep them from flopping around compared to steel, so that cuts the weight advantage a bit. Ford trialled aluminium bonnets on the BA, there was a black Fairmont Ghia with a buldge bonnet that PD were testing, but they found that the bonnet flopped around a lot and needed a lot more bracing to keep it rigid. It didn't progress any further than testing.

I could just imagine the implications of light skinned aluminium panels -

1) Cops getting into a shoot out, would hide behind the doors, after hanging their spare bullet proof jackets on the door for protection.
2) When you get locked out of the car, you simply use a stanley knife to cut into the door skin, and unlock the car.
3) The car gets a 5 star Ancap rating, except when hail storms are forecast, and then helmets (and protective padding) are required for driver and passengers.
bobthebilda is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-05-2011, 09:12 PM   #35
janddbone
B1 - J & D Services
Donating Member1
 
janddbone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brim, Victoria
Posts: 1,629
Default Re: $40m taxpayer injection for lightweight Commodore

My 1967 Rover has an aluminum boot and bonnet, so it is not that radical. It is nice to have these sorts of panels light to use.

Would be nice if my Nissan Patrol had an aluminum bonnet, then I wouldn't throw me shoulder out every time I lift it!
__________________
Mr. Brett Johnstone.
2007 Honda Odyssey
2002 Ford Laser
2000 Ford Falcon Wagon Egas
1999 Subaru Imprezza Sportwagon
1998 Holden Suburban 2500
1995 Land Rover Discovery TDI
1994 XG XR6 Longreach
1983 Holden Rodeo
1982 ZK Fairlane 302 six seater
1975 Datsun 120Y wagon
1970 MG Midget
1967 Rover 2000TC
Soon: Model T.
janddbone is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-05-2011, 09:20 PM   #36
2011G6E
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
2011G6E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: On The Footplate.
Posts: 5,086
Default Re: $40m taxpayer injection for lightweight Commodore

Ah yes, a future with a light weight family sized car utilising modern materials...

We used to imagine back in the early eighties what "cars of the future" would be like. We didn't foresee that a simple base model V6 or straight 6 would have more power than the thumping V8's we all aspired to own, we didn't foresee the amazing fuel consumption figures you could get out of even a big V8...

...but we really didn't expect a family car to keep bloating in weight until the damn things weigh almost 1800kg...
2011G6E is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-05-2011, 09:31 PM   #37
Road_Warrior
Pity the fool
 
Road_Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wait Awhile
Posts: 8,997
Default Re: $40m taxpayer injection for lightweight Commodore

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2011G6E
...but we really didn't expect a family car to keep bloating in weight until the damn things weigh almost 1800kg...
This is what happens when people demand proper safety features or governments start mandating baseline crash safety. All this stuff isn't just made up of fairy dust you know...
__________________
Fords I own or have owned:

1970 XW Falcon GT replica | 1970 XW Falcon | 1971 XY Fairmont | 1973 ZG Fairlane | 1986 XF Falcon panel van | 1987 XFII Falcon S-Pack | 1988 XF Falcon GLS ute | 1993 EBII Fairmont V8 | 1996 XG Falcon ute | 2000 AU Falcon wagon | 2004 BA Falcon XT | 2012 SZ Territory Titanium AWD

Proud to buy Australian and support Ford Australia through thick and thin
Road_Warrior is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-05-2011, 10:17 PM   #38
Wretched
Render unto Caesar
 
Wretched's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ::1
Posts: 4,216
Default Re: $40m taxpayer injection for lightweight Commodore

Quote:
Originally Posted by vibe_xr6
hmmm, i personally think now they are getting ahead of the competition.
They've realised the Falcon isn't the "competition" anymore, it's a world market.
If they do it the benefits are there. Just look at the Jag XJ and the Audi A8. Both large vehicles but don't have the "average" weight of such behemoths, though they're not what you would call a light weight.

Holden is taking advantage of the $$ on offer and are (hopefully) putting them to good use. Ford did the same with the LPG and I4T. Hopefully we're seeing more innovation from these two.
__________________
"Aliens might be surprised to learn that in a cosmos with limitless starlight, humans kill for energy sources buried in sand." - Neil deGrasse Tyson
Wretched is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-05-2011, 10:19 PM   #39
Polyal
Virtuous Bogan (TM)
Donating Member2
 
Polyal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,473
Default Re: $40m taxpayer injection for lightweight Commodore

Or anywhere even remotely near the market segment of the commodore/falcon.
__________________
  • 2023 Mitsubishi Triton
  • 2017 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
  • 2003 CL7 Honda Accord Euro R (JDM) - K20A 6MT
  • 1999 Lexus IS200 - 1G-FE Turbo 6MT
  • 1973 ZF Ford Fairlane
Polyal is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-05-2011, 10:27 PM   #40
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,196
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default Re: $40m taxpayer injection for lightweight Commodore

Makes you wonder just what kind of weight saving can be had when the game isn't all about stiffening the body
for performance improvements or designing the cars to tow horse floats, car trailers and 23 foot caravans...

Ecoboost Falcon, lighter shell with 1500 KG towing capacity and 7.5 l/100 km fuel economy just like Ecoboost Mondeo....
jpd80 is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-05-2011, 10:35 PM   #41
stang65
FPRJET
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,143
Default Re: $40m taxpayer injection for lightweight Commodore

Quote:
Originally Posted by Road_Warrior
That'd be the Boron Alloy steel used in the FG.

Unless you're talking about this carbon nanotube stuff Ford US said they were fiddling with?

Yep thats it, I wasn`t saying Ford Aus, but hopefully it would trickle here eventually. Thanks.
stang65 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-05-2011, 10:53 PM   #42
Road_Warrior
Pity the fool
 
Road_Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wait Awhile
Posts: 8,997
Default Re: $40m taxpayer injection for lightweight Commodore

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpd80
Makes you wonder just what kind of weight saving can be had when the game isn't all about stiffening the body
for performance improvements or designing the cars to tow horse floats, car trailers and 23 foot caravans...

Ecoboost Falcon, lighter shell with 1500 KG towing capacity and 7.5 l/100 km fuel economy just like Ecoboost Mondeo....
Well I've always thought the Ecoboost Falcon should have a shorter front overhang (and different front and rear styling) to make it like a RWD Mondeo. Lopping some steel off the front end and that all alloy I4T ought to shed what, 100kg off the car? Then use forged alloy control arms in the IRS to cut some weight, plastic spare wheel well and boot floor and we're getting close...
__________________
Fords I own or have owned:

1970 XW Falcon GT replica | 1970 XW Falcon | 1971 XY Fairmont | 1973 ZG Fairlane | 1986 XF Falcon panel van | 1987 XFII Falcon S-Pack | 1988 XF Falcon GLS ute | 1993 EBII Fairmont V8 | 1996 XG Falcon ute | 2000 AU Falcon wagon | 2004 BA Falcon XT | 2012 SZ Territory Titanium AWD

Proud to buy Australian and support Ford Australia through thick and thin
Road_Warrior is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-05-2011, 10:57 PM   #43
Wretched
Render unto Caesar
 
Wretched's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ::1
Posts: 4,216
Default Re: $40m taxpayer injection for lightweight Commodore

Quote:
Originally Posted by Polyal
Or anywhere even remotely near the market segment of the commodore/falcon.
That has nothing to do with it.
__________________
"Aliens might be surprised to learn that in a cosmos with limitless starlight, humans kill for energy sources buried in sand." - Neil deGrasse Tyson
Wretched is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-05-2011, 11:32 PM   #44
Polyal
Virtuous Bogan (TM)
Donating Member2
 
Polyal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,473
Default Re: $40m taxpayer injection for lightweight Commodore

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wretched
That has nothing to do with it.
Of course it does, its not as simple as just switching materials.

These cars are built to a budget, I cant see a $30-50k car having expensive materials added on the volumes they currently sell. While the commys export programs are greater than a falcon its hardly what you would define as a "world car".

Have a look at the cars that employe alternative materials, they are either true "world cars" or are priced accordingly.

BTW 7% reduction in FE is a massive claim.
__________________
  • 2023 Mitsubishi Triton
  • 2017 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
  • 2003 CL7 Honda Accord Euro R (JDM) - K20A 6MT
  • 1999 Lexus IS200 - 1G-FE Turbo 6MT
  • 1973 ZF Ford Fairlane
Polyal is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-05-2011, 11:51 PM   #45
Wretched
Render unto Caesar
 
Wretched's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ::1
Posts: 4,216
Default Re: $40m taxpayer injection for lightweight Commodore

Quote:
Originally Posted by Polyal
Of course it does, its not as simple as just switching materials.

These cars are built to a budget, I cant see a $30-50k car having expensive materials added on the volumes they currently sell. While the commys export programs are greater than a falcon its hardly what you would define as a "world car".

Have a look at the cars that employe alternative materials, they are either true "world cars" or are priced accordingly.

BTW 7% reduction in FE is a massive claim.
Now did I even compare the local products to these cars? No I didn't. I simply used them as an example of already established LARGE cars that use aluminium panels and the benefits it provides.

I realise the costs of producing cars with aluminium panels but it wasn't what I was referring to. Ford in the US have used aluminium in cars for years. The Mustang GT has a bonnet made of aluminium as does the F-150. yes they sell more than the local cars here but it isn't the exotic material it used to be. Eventually carbon fibre will start to be used more often too.

If Holden can pull it off kudos to them. Even if it is a couple of panels, the boot, roof and or bonnet.
__________________
"Aliens might be surprised to learn that in a cosmos with limitless starlight, humans kill for energy sources buried in sand." - Neil deGrasse Tyson
Wretched is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-05-2011, 12:19 AM   #46
FalconXV
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
FalconXV's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,135
Default Re: $40m taxpayer injection for lightweight Commodore

Quote:
Originally Posted by Road_Warrior
Well I've always thought the Ecoboost Falcon should have a shorter front overhang (and different front and rear styling) to make it like a RWD Mondeo. Lopping some steel off the front end and that all alloy I4T ought to shed what, 100kg off the car? Then use forged alloy control arms in the IRS to cut some weight, plastic spare wheel well and boot floor and we're getting close...
I read in another thread that SZ Territory's K-frame/ front suspension is lighter than it's predecessor. Is that true? if so how and will it also be a feature of the FG2, to really add to the advantage of less front end weight. EB Falcon could be one of the best balanced cars on the market if it has say rear mounted battery, EPAS etc
FalconXV is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-05-2011, 12:36 AM   #47
Polyal
Virtuous Bogan (TM)
Donating Member2
 
Polyal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,473
Default Re: $40m taxpayer injection for lightweight Commodore

Fair enough, but first you say the Falcon is not a competitor then you use two $150k+ cars as an example, there is a reason they can use it and thats because they can charge for it, so price is a pretty large factor.

Your right its nothing new, Ford even back in 2005 were developing Al suspension parts, all of it is really nice until you rationalize the cost of it. CF is even worse, until there is a better/more efficient way to manufacture parts with it it will always remain a costly material.

Agreed, if Holden pull it off all the power to them, but its sounds like more of the Caprice PPV to me, although this has a higher chance of happening. And unless they use it predominately structurally the gains wont be massive. I think the Jag's entire body structure is Al isnt it?
__________________
  • 2023 Mitsubishi Triton
  • 2017 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
  • 2003 CL7 Honda Accord Euro R (JDM) - K20A 6MT
  • 1999 Lexus IS200 - 1G-FE Turbo 6MT
  • 1973 ZF Ford Fairlane
Polyal is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-05-2011, 12:51 AM   #48
JPFS1
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
JPFS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,504
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community. 
Default Re: $40m taxpayer injection for lightweight Commodore

outer skins have very little impact on crash worthiness. There are many other issues/concerns that need to be considered when material changes are made to skin panels.

It is a significant change mid cycle for sure when you consider all the development and change that has to happen to pull it off. This of course is something that Holden would have been working on as part of the initial VE platform development though i'm sure.
JPFS1 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-05-2011, 12:59 AM   #49
z80
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 598
Default Re: $40m taxpayer injection for lightweight Commodore

Carbon fibre would be my choice instead of aluminium.

It all sounds like lip service to me..
z80 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-05-2011, 01:26 AM   #50
vztrt
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
 
vztrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,797
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: vztrt is one of the most consistent and respected contributors to AFF, I have found his contributions are most useful to discussion as well as answering members queries. 
Default Re: $40m taxpayer injection for lightweight Commodore

Quote:
Originally Posted by FalconXV
I read in another thread that SZ Territory's K-frame/ front suspension is lighter than it's predecessor. Is that true? if so how and will it also be a feature of the FG2, to really add to the advantage of less front end weight. EB Falcon could be one of the best balanced cars on the market if it has say rear mounted battery, EPAS etc

The FG got a whole heap of weight saves so that when it came out it would have a minimal weight increase. They managed to keep the weight gain to 14kg, which is much better then AU to BA which was a big increase.
__________________
Daniel
vztrt is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-05-2011, 09:06 AM   #51
Nikked
Oo\===/oO
 
Nikked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tamworth
Posts: 11,348
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Long time member, loves Fords, sensible contributor and does some good and interesting posts. 
Default Re: $40m taxpayer injection for lightweight Commodore

I would think the aluminum would be limited to a bonnet...
__________________





Check out my Photo-chop page

T...I...C...K...F...O...R...D
\≡≡T≡≡/
Nikked is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-05-2011, 09:35 AM   #52
2011G6E
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
2011G6E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: On The Footplate.
Posts: 5,086
Default Re: $40m taxpayer injection for lightweight Commodore

Aluminium panels aren't a huge problem (except when you have to have them fixed at the panel beaters) but alloy bodies make it harder for a car to pass crashworthiness.

Not only that, but insurance costs would go through the roof for the previously-mentioned problem with panel beating. The workers really need to know what they're doing as you don't get a second chance with alloy once it's been bent...sometimes a good crinkle that, with steel panels, would mean some beating and heat-shrinking, will simply be binned and replaced. I know that happens now sometimes, but once your car is a few years old, it'll become a problem.

If mass-production of carbon fiber can be done cheaply enough, it will be good too...but even less repairable than alloy.

There's no simple answers.
2011G6E is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-05-2011, 03:04 PM   #53
mcnamg
Regular Member
 
mcnamg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 287
Default Re: $40m taxpayer injection for lightweight Commodore

When I read the title of this thread I figured it was an article about the Cruze and someone was making a joke
mcnamg is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 04:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL