Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > Ford Australia Vehicles > Small and Mid Sized Cars > Focus

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13-04-2009, 11:06 PM   #1
DZFord
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
DZFord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Victoria
Posts: 877
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: LS Focus PCV Valve & Hose replacement, a very detailed write up with photos. 
Default My lower airbox removal project

Today I removed the lower airbox / intake resonator. I used RJO89's instructions from HERE (Post #20 - Thanks mate!)

Here are my experiences:

First you have to jack up the car, then remove the plastic lining of the wheel arch, passenger side headlight & fog light (if fitted):




After taking out the 3 screws holding it in place, you can rip the whole thing right out (for what it actually does it's huge!)




My mate and I then routed a 3-inch flexipipe from under the wheel arch, right up to the pod filter:


The smaller pipe here is the one that you get in the K&N Kit. It comes from in front of the radiator:




Finished:





The result:
- Better fuel efficiency! It's dropped from 12.0L/100km to about 8.5L/100km (90% of my driving is done in peak hour)
- Very slight increase in power, especially lower down and at the very top end of the range.

My overall impressions:

After several months of running the K&N setup, I think it has two major downfalls - no heat-shielding & lack of proper cold air flow (especially with the single flexi-tube provided in the kit). It's only now, after running this second tube that I am happier with the performance.

I think you'd be better off following this approach HERE


Last edited by DZFord; 13-04-2009 at 11:16 PM.
DZFord is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-04-2009, 03:31 PM   #2
DZFord
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
DZFord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Victoria
Posts: 877
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: LS Focus PCV Valve & Hose replacement, a very detailed write up with photos. 
Default

Update: In traffic this morning, the engine levelled off at 10.5L/100km, which is still a little better I guess!
DZFord is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-04-2009, 07:01 PM   #3
More revs
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 551
Default

I doubt this mod will affect fuel economy but if it gives a stronger top end say from 4500 up I'd do it myself. I'd be happy with 15l/100Km so long as it pulled like a 16 year old.
More revs is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-04-2009, 01:29 AM   #4
Mullett
Badly Focused
 
Mullett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 487
Default

Likewise, i wouldn't expect a significant change in fuel consumption from a *stock* car. Driving in peak traffic, your underbonnet temps would be through the roof, and with the K+N intake, your intake air would have been at least 50+ degrees sitting in traffic. The ECU will retard the timing, and probably richen the mixtures to prevent detonation, so there's a good chance that doing the airbox mod to replace the K+N kit HAS improved fuel economy on your car.

-RM.
__________________
07 LT CL, CAI, timing, XR5 springs, LS Zetec wheels
16.045...0.05 of a second! I wanted a 15sec pass!

93 GSR/Evo3...too much to mention, 12.2sec 1/4, FOR SALE!

*Maybe we don't try putting holes in things that sink, yeah?*
Mullett is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 08:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL