View Single Post
Old 20-01-2021, 06:56 PM   #17
DFB FGXR6
Donating Member
Donating Member3
 
DFB FGXR6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 11,733
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: For the excellent car-care guide 
Default Re: Top 10 Experimental Australian engines / abandoned programs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Franco Cozzo View Post
Ford 3.7L Cyclone V6 is in early model Mazda CX9 I believe.

204KW/6250rpm 367NM/4250rpm - Ninety percent of torque from 2800rpm (330NM).

How does that compare to FG Barra?

Power: 195 kW (261 hp) @ 6000 rpm
Torque: 391 N⋅m (288 lb⋅ft) @ 3250 rpm

So basically Ford 3.7L Cyclone V6 is much more technologically advanced, but it sucks because it puts out less torque at 1000 RPM later than our home grown dinosaur
Just to add to your post, the Barra on premium would top the Cyclone V6 on power and smash it for torque.


https://www.fordforums.com.au/vbport...?articleid=432
"Additional performance and efficiency benefits can be obtained from using a higher octane, 95 RON unleaded fuel, liberating even more power and torque from the I6 engine, with peak power and torque outputs rising to 198 kW and 409 Nm respectively.

Courtesy of the engine's dual knock sensors and individual spark control, customers can obtain even further performance benefits from using 98 RON premium unleaded fuel."


I remember at the time a Ford engineer was quoted in the media stating that on 98 RON, power would be over 200 kW.
__________________
PX MK II Ranger
FG XR6
FG X XR8
Mustang GT

T3 TS50 - gone but not forgotten
DFB FGXR6 is offline   Reply With Quote
3 users like this post: