View Single Post
Old 04-02-2013, 10:54 PM   #193
4.0i OHC
Computer Torque Control
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Ballarat East
Posts: 546
Default Re: Great Wall Motors. Any good?

Quote:
Originally Posted by gassed250 View Post
You may as well compare an AU Falcon to an FG
An AU sedan with airbags only scores 3 starts making it 1 better than the old GW with no airbags
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbVobsLvV7E
Not all star ratings are equal. The AU sedan gets a safety rating of 24.2/37, just 0.3 short of a 4 star rating. The safest Aussie family car at the time. How did the Merc E class of the time fare? 25.7/37. The Falcon actually performed better than the Merc in the frontal offset crash test (11.37/16 vs 10.36/16), and only slightly worse for side impact (11.13/16 vs 11.33/16)

The Great Wall V240 on the other hand? 16.49/37. What did the Great Wall score in the offset crash test? 2.36/16. That's alarming. Surprisingly enough, the car performed perfectly in the side impact test (!) but the horrifying frontal crash test score can't be ignored. How do most crashes occur, anyway?

We should also compare apples with apples. The AU ute gets a safety rating of 4 stars, and it can't achieve 5 stars anyway due to the lack of stability control and seatbelt reminder sound.

As for the GW itself? My mum's cousin owned one, the tray was askew from factory. He upgraded to an early 2000s Mazda B-series.
__________________
“Cookie Monster” 2018 BMW 118i M Sport 6MT Estoril Blue
“Jill” 1997 Ford Falcon GLi Sapphire 5MT Regency
“Sally” 1997 BMW 318i Executive 5MT Alpine White
4.0i OHC is offline   Reply With Quote
This user likes this post: